Media Search
Custom Search
Media Search Results
Showing posts with label news. Show all posts
Showing posts with label news. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Friday, April 02, 2010
npr app



The closest thing to Radio4 you'll get in the US. The app is a smart mix of news, social and streamed on air radio.
Friday, March 26, 2010
You couldn't make this up
Saturday, February 27, 2010
french bistros and cafes in sharp decline

Times are hard for Le Fontenoy, the only surviving cafe in this village in north-central France which once had three, as well as a butcher's, a boulangerie, a grocer's and a restaurant. Now, as changing habits and new laws alter the residents' relationship with an erstwhile local fixture, its future is looking bleak. It is a bistro with no kitchen, a former tabac with no cigarettes, and Letouzey's coffers are as empty as his bottle of pastis. read more
Wednesday, February 03, 2010
New Newspapers
Labels:
apple,
design,
digital,
ipad,
news,
newspapers,
technology,
video
Monday, November 02, 2009
Painful death of the American economic dream

This crisis has been a long time in coming, and history suggests that the period of upheaval will be long and painful, just as it was between 1914 and 1945
Larry Elliott
guardian.co.uk,
Monday 2 November 2009
Saturday, October 24, 2009
theartsdesk
Newspapers are cutting back on journalists and art reviewers. Meanwhile a load off the Telegraph reviewers have started their own news desk in the form of The Arts Desk. Maybe they are onto the new model papers have been talking about for so long.
Thursday, June 25, 2009
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
sapient buy nitro
Friday, May 15, 2009
The Internet is Killing America's Free Press


Really good debate by Jerry Bowles to get going. Andrew Keen touched on some of these points at Next09 in Hamburg. I really fear for the loss of quality in depth reporting. I think there are a few models that could work but the US may need to change it's mind set around only free market only funded news.
I believe we need 3 models for a free press.
1. State funded news. Here in the UK we have the BBC one of the most respected news sources in the world. There is a debate right now that some of our tax payers license fee should go towards supporting other local, regional and national news away from the BBC. I think this could be a good thing as long as it is monitored and audited away from state control as the BBC is. This keeps the BBC impartial, non-political and non-commercial.
2. Ad funded free market press. We have both right and left leaning press here and its a good thing it challenges the BBC and each other so we have a good healthy 3 points of debate going on constantly. These guys are struggling to find new ad models but they will get there. I would be looking at a syndication model across all news websites, pay as you go model like News Corp are thinking about but across all titles. Similar to my twitter feed set up of, WSJ, FT, BBC, Guardian, Telegraph, NY Times, Fox, Aljazera, Rueters, Times and the Economist.
3. Social Media - Letting people have their say is a good thing, it builds traffic and healthy debate like this one we are having now to discuss fact, fiction and the in between. I don't see social press as being a replacement for professional journalism it's un-checked, under-funded and to subjective. All the ref of stories built from social media always lead to the mob angry or sensational tabloid headlines, swine flu (turned out to not be a pandemic) landing on hudson river (it's a miracle) but as Bowles points out indepth dangerous reporting that takes money and a crack team to report on. This un covering the truth and not making more noise is what professional journalism is about. I think social media has a role to play in the debate, traffic and adding more insight (Mubai twitters good example) to the stories but as the Telegraph here in the UK has proved with the bomb shell of MPs expenses, good solid investigation and reporting drives readership and truth.
This is a great debate I hope it will continue.
Labels:
journalism,
media,
news,
newspapers,
social media
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Quality costs, it's as simple as that
Telegraph: Shane Richmond at May 13, 2009
http://tinyurl.com/q5okpc sparks another debate on paid for news.
I think this is a huge issue that needs to be debated and quickly. Newspapers are struggling to find a viable business model online and it should concern us all. With out quality professional journalism our democracy will fail. bloggers and amateur journalists are not an answer to the well funded and resource strong news papers.
Reading news online is very different to paper format. users have a fragmented approach to their content. One minute they could be on The Economist website, then off to Telegraph, Guardian, WSJ, Washington Post, NY Times and so on Regular subs for one paper doesn't work as who wants their online news from one source.
A good model to look at would be a portfolio subscription model. So the more you consume the more you pay. Some users dip into a few articles a day and others read lots. The subscription could work against link models and a reimbursement model for each paper.
I do think that some of our license fee should go towards funding journalism and local news and not just to the BBC. This should be monitored and controlled by an independent press authority away from the BBC, government and media companies influence.
Like the credit crunch we now have to pay for the free content binge we have all taken for granted. I always hear people saying good riddance to old media, well be careful what you wish for as new media is uncontrolled, under funded and a poor substitute for professional journalism.
http://tinyurl.com/q5okpc sparks another debate on paid for news.
I think this is a huge issue that needs to be debated and quickly. Newspapers are struggling to find a viable business model online and it should concern us all. With out quality professional journalism our democracy will fail. bloggers and amateur journalists are not an answer to the well funded and resource strong news papers.
Reading news online is very different to paper format. users have a fragmented approach to their content. One minute they could be on The Economist website, then off to Telegraph, Guardian, WSJ, Washington Post, NY Times and so on Regular subs for one paper doesn't work as who wants their online news from one source.
A good model to look at would be a portfolio subscription model. So the more you consume the more you pay. Some users dip into a few articles a day and others read lots. The subscription could work against link models and a reimbursement model for each paper.
I do think that some of our license fee should go towards funding journalism and local news and not just to the BBC. This should be monitored and controlled by an independent press authority away from the BBC, government and media companies influence.
Like the credit crunch we now have to pay for the free content binge we have all taken for granted. I always hear people saying good riddance to old media, well be careful what you wish for as new media is uncontrolled, under funded and a poor substitute for professional journalism.
Tuesday, May 05, 2009
Monday, March 30, 2009
Media/Marketing Chaos in action

The New York Times. TV Guide. Clear Channel. NBC, Boxee, Yahoo.
They tell the story. There is no longer a need to warn of a gathering Chaos Scenario, in which the yin of media and yang of marketing fly apart, symbiotic no more. There is no need to seed doubt about the internet's prospects as an advertising medium, nor otherwise be a prophet of doom. By Bob Garfield | Published: March 23, 2009
In free fall, it amazes me that so many people are prepared to accept mediocrity news. Free papers and news groups that publish visual shit and people just eat it. Is this the end of objective in-depth reporting.
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
NY Times follow the campaign trail in pictures
Saturday, October 18, 2008
Sunday, August 31, 2008
Monday, April 21, 2008
The Onion


Spoof US news which is so close to the real thing most people believe it. And watching Fox News that's saying something.
Living the dream.
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Time
Time pictures of the week
Friday, January 25, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








